Rocketship Education, And the Way It Operates

Rocketship Education refers to a national network that is non-profit making comprising of the public elementary schools giving service to the low-income societies whose access to the most excellent schools is limited. It was established in 2006, and the mission of the corporation remains in line with the elimination of the acquirement gap through the establishment of a sustainable and scalable school structure that accelerates the success of students from the underserved societies nationwide. The basis of the structure is an approach that is technologically supported and teacher-led towards personalized learning which matches every student with the appropriate content using the correct instructional method when the time is right.

It is through a deep engagement of the parents in the school and learning to surround of their students that Rocketship Education transforms parents into individuals who turn out to be enduring advocates for both the community as well as their children. United to the parents, districts, community organizations and the rest of the charter schools, Rocketship Education catalyzes a movement aimed at eradicating the gap of success in a lifetime. See parent involvement in the system’s curriculum .

According to the blogger Anya Kamenetz, the Rocketship Education network comprises of thirteen schools and is among the charter networks respected the most nationwide. This terms Rocketship Education, a model that is innovative in line with blended learning. However, the piece majorly depends on the reports of the problematic exercises linked to the network. The implication is that such practices remain familiar to the rest of the charter networks. They include long hours, strong discipline, formal classroom procedures, and high pressure. Countrywide, the practices have turned out under rising scrutiny. The non-profit making organizations depend on the profit-making ones for materials and services. The disparity in the status of tax is not very important. The traditional districts and schools operate in the same way but not usually considered as companies.

Interestingly, neither the editors nor Kamenetz himself appears to be entirely concerned about the chances that a piece like that could emerge as a takedown instead of straight journalism. This could be merely an indicator of the way the strength connected to anti-reform zeitgeist has intensified with regards to journalism and a reflection of the comfortable audience of NPR. The piece facilitates NPR towards making the scenario that its coverage of education is not beholden overly with regards to the funders. The article could be an attempt towards the generation of a controversy.